Enoxaparin in Primary and Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention:
A Formal Prospective Nonrandomized Substudy of the FINESSE Trial (Facilitated INtervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events)
Objectives
The aim of this study was to assess the risk-benefit of enoxaparin (Sanofi-Aventis, Paris, France) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Background
Randomized studies have demonstrated the superiority of enoxaparin over unfractionated heparin (UFH) in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with fibrinolytics.
Methods
In the FINESSE (Facilitated INtervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events) trial—a double-blind, placebo-controlled study—2,452 patients with STEMI were randomized to primary PCI or facilitated PCI with abciximab alone or with half-dose reteplase. In this prospective FINESSE substudy, centers pre-specified use of either enoxaparin (0.5 mg/kg intravenous [IV], 0.3 mg/kg subcutaneous [SC]) or UFH (40 U/kg IV, 3,000 U maximum) with PCI. A logistic-regression model and a propensity multivariate model, both adjusted for baseline variables, were used to evaluate primary safety and secondary efficacy end points for enoxaparin versus UFH.
Results
Enoxaparin was administered to 759 patients and UFH to 1,693 patients. Nonintracranial Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major/minor bleeding was not significantly different, but lower nonintracranial TIMI major bleeding was found with enoxaparin (2.6% vs. UFH 4.4%, logistic-regression adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31 to 0.99, p = 0.045), whereas intracranial hemorrhage was similar (0.27% vs. 0.24%, adjusted OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.11 to 9.68, p = 0.980). Lower death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, or refractory ischemia through 30 days was also associated with enoxaparin (5.3%) versus UFH (8.0%, adjusted OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.72, p = 0.0005) as was all-cause mortality through 90 days (3.8% vs. 5.6%, respectively, adjusted OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.99, p = 0.046). End points evaluating the net clinical benefit also significantly favored enoxaparin over UFH.
Conclusions
Enoxaparin seems to be associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes compared with UFH in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Confirmation of these findings in a randomized study is warranted. (A Study of Abciximab and Reteplase When Administered Prior to Catheterization After a Myocardial Infarction [Finesse]; NCT00046228)
Key Words: heparin, inhibitors, reperfusion
Abbreviations and Acronyms: ACT, activated clotting time, BMI, body mass index, CI, confidence interval, ECG, electrocardiogram, IV, intravenous, MI, myocardial infarction, OR, odds ratio, PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention, SC, subcutaneous, UFH, unfractionated heparin, STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, TIMI, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction
To access this article, please choose from the options below
This work was supported by Centocor, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana. Dr. Montalescot reports receiving consulting fees, speaking fees, and research grant support from Eli Lilly and Sanofi-Aventis. Dr. Ellis reports being employed and Dr. Topol reports having been employed by the Cleveland Clinic, which received research funds from Eli Lilly and Centocor to assist in the coordination of this study. Dr. de Belder reports receiving advisory board fees from Eli Lilly, fees provided for the United Kingdom coordination of the FINESSE trial, and lecture fees from Eli Lilly. Dr. Armstrong reports receiving research grants from Schering-Plough, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Hoffmann-La Roche. Dr. Effron reports being employed by Eli Lilly. Dr. Widimsky reports receiving consulting fees and speaking fees from Eli Lilly. Dr. Andersen reports receiving speaking fees and research grants from Eli Lilly. Dr. Herrmann reports receiving speaking fees from Schering-Plough and research grants from the Medicines Company, Conor Medsystems, and Schering-Plough. Drs. Barnathan and Lu report being employed by Centocor.
PII: S1936-8798(09)00832-2
doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.11.012
© 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
